FAI Media

Family · Supreme Court of Pakistan

Does a mother lose custody if she remarries?

The myth: “If a mother remarries, she loses custody of her children.”Wrong

The short answer

Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain v. SHO, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat, Supreme Court of Pakistan, 2024 SCMR 486, short order 13 December 2023 (judgment by Ijaz ul Ahsan, J).

Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain v. SHO, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2024 SCMR 486 · decided 13 December 2023

By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 13 October 2026 · 5 min read

Not automatically. A mother's second marriage is not, on its own, a reason to take her child away. In 2024 SCMR 486 the Supreme Court said "there is no legal justification for separating a mother from her child if the mother remarries", set aside a High Court order that had handed a four-year-old girl to her grandmother, and ordered her back to her mother within one week.

The honest limit: remarriage can still be one factor. The Guardian Court decides custody on evidence, by what is best for the child.

Key points

  • Section 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act tells the court to be guided by "the welfare of the minor". That is the test, not the mother's marital status.
  • Mulla's paragraphs 352 and 354 say a mother who remarries a stranger to the child loses custody. The Supreme Court has held for years that this rule is not absolute (2022 SCMR 2123, 2014 SCMR 343, quoted in para 27).
  • In this case the only ground for removing the child was the mother's remarriage (para 24). The Supreme Court called that practice something that "must end" (para 33).
  • A grandmother, or anyone else, who wants custody should go to the Guardian Court. A High Court habeas petition is not the route when that remedy exists (paras 23 to 25 and 35).

Gujrat, 2023: a girl taken from her mother for one reason

A couple in District Gujrat divorced. The mother kept their daughter, then about four, and later remarried. The father was settled abroad (para 2).

The paternal grandmother filed a habeas corpus petition in the Lahore High Court. Her case was that the second marriage disentitled the mother, because the child was now living in the house of a man who was not a mahram to her. On 21 September 2023 the High Court handed the girl to the grandmother as an interim arrangement (para 2).

The Supreme Court found that "the sole ground" for that order "was the mere contention that the Petitioner had remarried" (para 24).

What the law asks: one question

Section 17(1) of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 says the court shall be guided by what, consistently with the law the minor is subject to, "appears in the circumstances to be for the welfare of the minor". Section 17(2) lists what goes into that: the child's age, sex and religion, the character and capacity of the proposed guardian, nearness of kin and existing relations with the child.

Mulla's Principles of Mahomedan Law (paras 352 and 354) is often cited for the rule that a mother loses custody when she marries a man who is a stranger to the child. The Supreme Court repeated that this rule "is not absolute" and gives way to the child's welfare (Shabana Naz, 2014 SCMR 343, and Muhammad Owais, 2022 SCMR 2123, both quoted in para 27). It also noted the Federal Shariat Court's view that Mulla's book has no statutory force (Najaat Welfare Foundation, PLD 2021 FSC 1).

What the Supreme Court did

On 13 December 2023 the Court converted the petition into an appeal, allowed it and set the High Court's order aside. Its short order directed the Guardian Court in Gujrat to "ensure that the custody of the child is restored to the mother within one week".

Two reasons. First, the High Court should not have acted at all: the grandmother had a full remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act, so the writ was barred and the proceedings were without lawful authority (paras 25 and 35). Second, on the merits, reading Islamic principles together with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and CEDAW, the Court held there is no legal justification for separating a mother from her child because she remarries, and added: "This practice must end" (para 33).

The limit: the Guardian Court still decides

The Supreme Court said its observations were tentative and would not influence the Guardian Court, which must decide custody on the evidence (para 38). So a remarried mother does not win custody automatically either.

What the case settles is narrower and important: remarriage alone is no ground to take a child from her mother. The court has to look at the whole picture of the child's welfare.

The case at a glance

Facts
After a divorce, a mother in Gujrat kept her four-year-old daughter and remarried; the father lived abroad. The paternal grandmother filed a habeas petition, and on 21 September 2023 the Lahore High Court handed the child to her as an interim arrangement.
The question
Can a child be taken from her mother only because the mother has remarried, and can a grandmother use a habeas petition for that?
What the Court held
No. The High Court order was set aside and custody was restored to the mother within one week. There is no legal justification for separating a mother from her child because she remarries (para 33).
Why
Custody turns on the welfare of the minor. Mulla's remarriage rule is not absolute, and the grandmother had an adequate remedy before the Guardian Court, which barred the writ.
Limits
The Guardian Court decides permanent custody on evidence; the Supreme Court's views were tentative on the facts (para 38). Remarriage can still be weighed as one factor.

The law it relies on

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 s.17

The court is guided by what "appears in the circumstances to be for the welfare of the minor" (s.17(1)); age, sex, religion, character and capacity of the guardian, nearness of kin and existing relations count (s.17(2)); an older child's preference may be considered (s.17(3)).

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 s.25

Title of guardian to custody of ward: the route for a custody claim before the Guardian Court.

What this does not mean

  • It does not mean a remarried mother always keeps custody. The Guardian Court decides on evidence, by the child's welfare (para 38).
  • It does not cancel the father's rights. He can apply to the Guardian Court, and visitation is decided there.
  • It does not let anyone skip the Guardian Court. A High Court habeas petition is not the way to settle custody when that remedy is available.

Questions people ask

Does a mother lose custody of her child if she remarries in Pakistan?

Not automatically. The Supreme Court held in 2024 SCMR 486 that there is no legal justification for separating a mother from her child only because she remarries. The Guardian Court decides by the child's welfare.

What is the child custody law in Pakistan after divorce?

The Guardians and Wards Act 1890. The Guardian Court is guided by the welfare of the minor (s.17). Under Muslim personal law the mother usually has custody of a son until 7 and a daughter until puberty, but the Supreme Court treats these rules as subject to the child's welfare.

Can a grandmother take a child from the mother?

Not through a High Court habeas petition while the mother lawfully has the child and the Guardian Court remedy exists. In 2024 SCMR 486 the Supreme Court set aside such an order and returned the child to her mother.

Can the father take custody of the child after divorce in Pakistan?

He can apply to the Guardian Court, which decides by the child's welfare. The mother's second marriage alone does not decide it (2022 SCMR 2123, 2024 SCMR 486).

Where do I file for child custody?

Before the Guardian Court, which is the Family Court acting as Guardian Judge, under the Guardians and Wards Act 1890. Speak to a family lawyer about your own case.

Check yourself

True or false? “If a mother remarries, she loses custody of her children.”

Next one: true or false? “If a daughter marries without her father's consent, he can bring her home by force.”

Sources

  • Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain v. SHO, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat, 2024 SCMR 486 (Supreme Court of Pakistan, 13 December 2023), paras 2, 24, 25, 27, 33, 35, 38
    No legal justification for separating a mother from her child because she remarries; High Court order set aside; custody restored within one week. verified against full text
  • Raja Muhammad Owais v. Mst. Nazia Jabeen, 2022 SCMR 2123 (Supreme Court of Pakistan, 5 October 2022)
    A mother's second marriage cannot be a stand-alone reason to disqualify her from custody; welfare of the minor is paramount. headnote checked; passage quoted in 2024 SCMR 486 para 27
  • Shabana Naz v. Muhammad Saleem, 2014 SCMR 343 (Supreme Court of Pakistan)
    Mulla paras 352 and 354 are not absolute; custody may stay with a remarried mother if the child's welfare lies there. quoted in 2024 SCMR 486 para 27
  • Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, s.17, s.25 text checked in FAI Statute Search, 13 October 2026 Pakistan Code

Every quote and section above is traced to the full judgment or statute text by an automatic check that runs on every update.

What the reel says

Read the words of the reel

Does a mother lose custody of her children if she remarries?

Not automatically. The Supreme Court: "there is no legal justification for separating a mother from her child if the mother remarries" (2024 SCMR 486, para 33).

The case: Gujrat, 2023. After a divorce, a mother remarried; her four-year-old daughter lived with her. The High Court handed the girl to her grandmother. The only reason: the mother's second marriage.

The law: Guardians and Wards Act, section 17. One question: the welfare of the child.

Supreme Court (December 2023): the High Court's order set aside, the girl back with her mother within one week.

"This practice must end."

The limit: the Guardian Court still decides custody, by the child's welfare.

Share this with a mother who was told remarriage means losing her children.

Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your own matter. Reading this page does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

More from FAI Media

Family in slides