Courts and procedure · For advocates
Withdrawing the suit? Ask for liberty first.
In short
Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC, a plaintiff who withdraws without the court's permission pays costs and is barred from a fresh suit on the same subject matter. Permission is given only for a formal defect or other sufficient grounds.
By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 29 October 2026 · 12 slides · 2 min read
The law.
Order XXIII Rule 1(3), CPC.
“Where the plaintiff withdraws from a suit, or abandons part of a claim, without the permission referred to in sub-rule (2), he shall be liable for such costs as the Court may award and shall be precluded from instituting any fresh suit in respect of such subject-matter or such part of the claim.”
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order XXIII Rule 1(3), Withdrawal without permission
Two kinds of withdrawal.
Order XXIII, Rule 1.
- Plain, R.1(1)At any time, against all or any defendants.
- With liberty, R.1(2)Only for a formal defect, or other sufficient grounds.
Myth or fact?
What clients often think.
- Myth: Withdraw it now, we can file again later.
- Fact: Without the court's permission, a fresh suit on the same subject matter is barred (O.XXIII R.1(3); 1999 YLR 991; 2019 CLC 804).
Get it in words.
Two High Courts, two views.
- 2026 MLD 856Islamabad: permission is not presumed from your application. The court must pass a specific order.
- 2006 YLR 717Lahore: if prayed for and withdrawal allowed, it may be deemed built in.
- Safe courseHave the order say "with liberty".
Quick quiz. Limitation.
Guess first, then swipe for the answer.
- A. Afresh from withdrawal
- B. As if the first suit was never filed
- C. Paused during the first suit
Answer: B. Order XXIII Rule 2.
Code of Civil Procedure.
- The ruleBound by limitation as if the first suit had not been instituted.
- SoNo credit for the time the first suit was pending.
Three traps.
Rule 1 and the cases.
- Co-plaintiffsOne cannot withdraw without the others' consent (R.1(4)).
- CostsUnpaid costs can make the fresh suit incompetent (2005 CLC 33).
- ProofThe defendant must prove the bar: plaint and order (PLD 2004 Lah. 1).
Compromise. Rule 3.
Order XXIII, CPC.
- The ruleA lawful compromise, proved, is recorded and decreed.
- Unlawful termsSettling criminal cases in it cannot be decreed (2017 YLR 1713).
- Rule 4Order XXIII does not apply in execution.
Undoing a consent decree.
Section 12(2), CPC.
- The testFraud or misrepresentation on the court.
- 2015 CLC 877Duress alone, without that, does not fit s.12(2).
- PLD 2020 Kar. 136Consent decrees stand unless fraud is proved.
Drafting the application?
Ask FAI. It answers with the exact rule and the judgments behind it.
- Draft an application under Order XXIII Rule 1(2) CPC to withdraw a suit with liberty to file afresh.
- Is a fresh suit barred if permission to withdraw was not expressly granted?
Example questions
Sources
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order XXIII Rule 1(3)
Withdrawal without permission Pakistan Code
Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your situation. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

















