FAI Media

Courts and procedure · For citizens

Lent money? Write it down.

In short

Lending to family or friends on trust is common. But if they deny it later, the law asks for a written paper with two attesting witnesses, and both may have to come to court.

By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 10 October 2026 · 11 slides · 2 min read

  1. Lent money to a friend or relative?. Lent money? Write it down.
  2. Myth or fact? · What people say between friends. · Myth: He is family. A handshake is enough. · Fact: An oral deal is allowed, but courts ask for unimpeachable evidence to prove it (2017 CLCN 3, Lahore High Court).
  3. The rule in the law. · Article 17, Qanun-e-Shahadat. · Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 17(2)(a)
  4. Quick quiz. One witness. · Guess first, then swipe for the answer. · A. Yes, the paper is enough · B. No, two attesting witnesses · C. Yes, if it is on stamp paper
  5. Answer: B. Two witnesses. · The Supreme Court on Article 17. · PLD 2021 SC 538 · The count · In court
  6. Even if he never shows up. · 2023 SCMR 1118, Supreme Court. · Two witnesses · Ex parte too · Any party
  7. One exception. · Article 81, Qanun-e-Shahadat. · Myth: My second witness has moved away. My case is finished. · Fact: If the borrower admits he signed the document, that admission is enough proof against him (Art. 81; 2020 SCMR 197).
  8. Do it right. · Before the money leaves your hand. · Write it · Two witnesses · Keep them reachable
  9. Time limit. Three years. · Limitation Act, First Schedule. · Money lent · Counted from · Too late?
  10. Money stuck with someone? · Ask FAI in your own words. It answers with the exact law and the judgments behind it. · I lent my cousin Rs 5 lakh last year with one witness. Can I still recover it? · Draft a loan agreement with two attesting witnesses.
  11. Follow FAI Legal on Instagram, @fai_legal. Have you ever lent money without any paper?

Myth or fact?

What people say between friends.

  • Myth: He is family. A handshake is enough.
  • Fact: An oral deal is allowed, but courts ask for unimpeachable evidence to prove it (2017 CLCN 3, Lahore High Court).

The rule in the law.

Article 17, Qanun-e-Shahadat.

“in matters pertaining to financial or future obligations, if reduced to writing, the instrument shall be attested by two men, or one man and two women, so that one may remind the other, if necessary, and evidence shall be led accordingly.”

Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 17(2)(a), Competence and number of witnesses

Quick quiz. One witness.

Guess first, then swipe for the answer.

  • A. Yes, the paper is enough
  • B. No, two attesting witnesses
  • C. Yes, if it is on stamp paper

Answer: B. Two witnesses.

The Supreme Court on Article 17.

  • PLD 2021 SC 538Only one attesting witness produced. Execution not proved, suit dismissed.
  • The countTwo men, or one man and two women (Art. 17(2)(a)).
  • In courtBoth must be called to prove the paper (Art. 79).

Even if he never shows up.

2023 SCMR 1118, Supreme Court.

  • Two witnessesA financial document must be proved by its two attesting witnesses.
  • Ex parte tooThe rule applies even when the defendant is proceeded against ex parte.
  • Any partyPrivate parties and public bodies alike.

One exception.

Article 81, Qanun-e-Shahadat.

  • Myth: My second witness has moved away. My case is finished.
  • Fact: If the borrower admits he signed the document, that admission is enough proof against him (Art. 81; 2020 SCMR 197).

Do it right.

Before the money leaves your hand.

  • Write itAmount, date, and when it will be repaid.
  • Two witnessesTwo men, or one man and two women, sign it.
  • Keep them reachableThey must come to court if it is denied (Art. 79).

Time limit. Three years.

Limitation Act, First Schedule.

  • Money lentThree years (Art. 57).
  • Counted fromWhen the loan is made.
  • Too late?A suit filed after the period shall be dismissed (s.3).

Money stuck with someone?

Ask FAI in your own words. It answers with the exact law and the judgments behind it.

  • I lent my cousin Rs 5 lakh last year with one witness. Can I still recover it?
  • Draft a loan agreement with two attesting witnesses.

Example questions

What this does not mean

  • An oral loan is not illegal. Courts simply ask for unimpeachable evidence to prove it (2017 CLCN 3).
  • Stamp paper alone does not replace the two attesting witnesses for a written financial document (Art. 17(2)(a)).
  • If the borrower admits he signed the document, that admission is enough proof against him (Art. 81; 2020 SCMR 197).

Questions people ask

How many witnesses are needed for a loan agreement in Pakistan?

Two men, or one man and two women, must attest a written financial obligation (Qanun-e-Shahadat Art. 17(2)(a)). Both must be called to prove the paper in court (Art. 79).

Can I recover a loan with only one witness?

In PLD 2021 SC 538 only one attesting witness was produced, execution was not proved and the suit was dismissed. The exception is where the borrower admits he signed (Art. 81).

Is an oral loan valid in Pakistan?

An oral deal is allowed, but courts ask for unimpeachable evidence to prove it (2017 CLCN 3, Lahore High Court).

What is the time limit to recover lent money in Pakistan?

Three years from when the loan is made (Limitation Act, First Schedule, Art. 57). A suit filed after the period shall be dismissed (s.3).

Do witnesses need to appear if the borrower never comes to court?

Yes. A financial document must be proved by its two attesting witnesses even when the defendant is proceeded against ex parte (2023 SCMR 1118).

Sources

  • Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 17(2)(a)
    Competence and number of witnesses Pakistan Code

Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your situation. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

More in slides