FAI Media

Law study · For law students

Approvers and accomplices in 9 cards.

In short

Yes. Under Article 16 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat an accomplice is a competent witness, except in hadd cases, and a conviction on his word alone is not illegal. But Article 129(b) and the courts ask for corroboration as a rule of prudence.

By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 23 October 2026 · 12 slides · 2 min read

  1. For law students · Qanun-e-Shahadat. Approvers and accomplices in 9 cards.
  2. The law. · Article 16, Qanun-e-Shahadat. · Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 16
  3. The rule. Cards 1 to 3. · Article 16. · Competent · Except · Not illegal
  4. The caution. Cards 4 to 6. · Article 129(b) and the cases. · Presumption · Prudence · Double test
  5. The pardon. Cards 7 to 9. · Section 337, CrPC. · The deal · Hurt or qatl · Witness
  6. Quick quiz. The co-accused. · Guess first, then swipe for the answer. · A. Yes, it prejudices him · B. No, he can cross-examine · C. Only in the High Court
  7. Answer: B. 2016 PCrLJ 714. · Lahore High Court. · The holding · His remedy
  8. How much corroboration? · PLD 2020 Lah. 690, Lahore High Court. · No formula · Must cover
  9. Custody until trial. · Section 337(3), CrPC. · The rule
  10. Mix-ups to avoid. · Three lines examiners test. · Competent, not credible · Law vs prudence · Hadd
  11. Stuck on approvers? · Ask FAI. It answers with the exact article and the judgments that explain it. · Explain Article 16 and Article 129(b) Qanun-e-Shahadat with Supreme Court cases. · When can a court tender a pardon under section 337 CrPC?
  12. Follow FAI Legal on Instagram, @fai_legal. Would you trust an approver without corroboration?

The law.

Article 16, Qanun-e-Shahadat.

“An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person, except in the case of an offence punishable with had; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.”

Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 16, Accomplice

The rule. Cards 1 to 3.

Article 16.

  • CompetentAn accomplice can testify against the accused. (Art. 16)
  • ExceptNot in an offence punishable with hadd. (Art. 16)
  • Not illegalA conviction on his word alone is not illegal. (Art. 16)

The caution. Cards 4 to 6.

Article 129(b) and the cases.

  • PresumptionUnworthy of credit unless corroborated in material particulars. (Art. 129(b))
  • PrudenceCourts seek corroboration as a rule of prudence. (1993 SCMR 785)
  • Double testReliable in itself, and corroborated independently. (PLD 2002 Kar. 152)

The pardon. Cards 7 to 9.

Section 337, CrPC.

  • The dealPardon on a full and true disclosure of the offence. (s.337(1))
  • Hurt or qatlNo pardon without the victim's or heirs' permission. (s.337(1))
  • WitnessHe must be examined as a witness at the trial. (s.337(2))

Quick quiz. The co-accused.

Guess first, then swipe for the answer.

  • A. Yes, it prejudices him
  • B. No, he can cross-examine
  • C. Only in the High Court

Answer: B. 2016 PCrLJ 714.

Lahore High Court.

  • The holdingWith the heirs' permission, the co-accused could not challenge the pardon.
  • His remedyAmple opportunity to cross-examine the approver.

How much corroboration?

PLD 2020 Lah. 690, Lahore High Court.

  • No formulaIt depends on the crime, the evidence and his part in it.
  • Must coverThe general story, and the accused's identity and part in the crime.

Custody until trial.

Section 337(3), CrPC.

  • The ruleUnless already on bail, he stays in custody until the trial ends.

Mix-ups to avoid.

Three lines examiners test.

  • Competent, not credibleArt. 16 lets him testify. Art. 129(b) weighs his word.
  • Law vs prudenceCorroboration is prudence, not a legal bar.
  • HaddThe one place Art. 16 shuts him out.

Stuck on approvers?

Ask FAI. It answers with the exact article and the judgments that explain it.

  • Explain Article 16 and Article 129(b) Qanun-e-Shahadat with Supreme Court cases.
  • When can a court tender a pardon under section 337 CrPC?

Example questions

Sources

  • Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 16
    Accomplice Pakistan Code

Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your situation. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

More in slides