Law study · For law students
Approvers and accomplices in 9 cards.
In short
Yes. Under Article 16 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat an accomplice is a competent witness, except in hadd cases, and a conviction on his word alone is not illegal. But Article 129(b) and the courts ask for corroboration as a rule of prudence.
By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 23 October 2026 · 12 slides · 2 min read
The law.
Article 16, Qanun-e-Shahadat.
“An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person, except in the case of an offence punishable with had; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.”
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 16, Accomplice
The rule. Cards 1 to 3.
Article 16.
- CompetentAn accomplice can testify against the accused. (Art. 16)
- ExceptNot in an offence punishable with hadd. (Art. 16)
- Not illegalA conviction on his word alone is not illegal. (Art. 16)
The caution. Cards 4 to 6.
Article 129(b) and the cases.
- PresumptionUnworthy of credit unless corroborated in material particulars. (Art. 129(b))
- PrudenceCourts seek corroboration as a rule of prudence. (1993 SCMR 785)
- Double testReliable in itself, and corroborated independently. (PLD 2002 Kar. 152)
The pardon. Cards 7 to 9.
Section 337, CrPC.
- The dealPardon on a full and true disclosure of the offence. (s.337(1))
- Hurt or qatlNo pardon without the victim's or heirs' permission. (s.337(1))
- WitnessHe must be examined as a witness at the trial. (s.337(2))
Quick quiz. The co-accused.
Guess first, then swipe for the answer.
- A. Yes, it prejudices him
- B. No, he can cross-examine
- C. Only in the High Court
Answer: B. 2016 PCrLJ 714.
Lahore High Court.
- The holdingWith the heirs' permission, the co-accused could not challenge the pardon.
- His remedyAmple opportunity to cross-examine the approver.
How much corroboration?
PLD 2020 Lah. 690, Lahore High Court.
- No formulaIt depends on the crime, the evidence and his part in it.
- Must coverThe general story, and the accused's identity and part in the crime.
Custody until trial.
Section 337(3), CrPC.
- The ruleUnless already on bail, he stays in custody until the trial ends.
Mix-ups to avoid.
Three lines examiners test.
- Competent, not credibleArt. 16 lets him testify. Art. 129(b) weighs his word.
- Law vs prudenceCorroboration is prudence, not a legal bar.
- HaddThe one place Art. 16 shuts him out.
Stuck on approvers?
Ask FAI. It answers with the exact article and the judgments that explain it.
- Explain Article 16 and Article 129(b) Qanun-e-Shahadat with Supreme Court cases.
- When can a court tender a pardon under section 337 CrPC?
Example questions
Sources
- Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 · Article 16
Accomplice Pakistan Code
Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your situation. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

















