Courts and procedure · For advocates
Suit dismissed for default? Thirty days to restore.
In short
After a dismissal under Order IX Rule 8 CPC, the plaintiff cannot file a fresh suit on the same cause. He can apply to set the dismissal aside on sufficient cause, with notice to the other side (O.IX R.9), within thirty days of the dismissal (Limitation Act Art.163), and section 5 applies (R.9(3)).
By the FAI Legal editorial desk · 19 October 2026 · 12 slides · 2 min read
Quick quiz. Fresh suit?
Guess first, then swipe for the answer.
- A. Yes
- B. No, he must apply to restore
- C. Only with leave of court
Answer: B. Rule 9(1).
The rule in the law.
“Where a suit is wholly or partly dismissed under rule 8, the plaintiff shall be precluded from bringing a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. But he may apply for an order to set the dismissal aside, and if he satisfies the Court that there was sufficient cause for his non-appearance ... the Court shall make an order setting aside the dismissal ...”
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order IX Rule 9(1), Decree against plaintiff by default bars fresh suit
Which rule?
Order IX, CPC.
- Rules 3 and 4Neither side appears: dismissed. Fresh suit (subject to limitation) or restoration.
- Rule 8Only the defendant appears: dismissed, unless he admits the claim.
- Rule 9After rule 8: no fresh suit. Restoration only.
The clock.
Limitation and notice.
- Article 163Thirty days from the date of the dismissal.
- Section 5Applies to rule 9 applications (O.IX R.9(3)).
- NoticeNo order without notice to the opposite party (R.9(2)).
Myth or fact?
The in time trap.
- Myth: Filed within thirty days, so restoration is automatic.
- Fact: "Some important business" is vague and is not sufficient cause. Restoration refused (PLD 2021 SC 761).
Filed late?
2025 SCMR 2092, Supreme Court.
- The factsRestoration filed after thirty days, with a s.5 application explaining the delay.
- The holdingThe trial court accepted both. The revisional court should not have reversed that discretion.
- ResultThe trial court's order was restored.
Reasons on record.
2022 MLD 831, Islamabad High Court.
- The testThe court must apply the sufficient cause test.
- Write itAnd record why the absence was excusable.
- ResultA restoration with no reasons was set aside and remanded.
Suit or application?
2019 PLD 723, Lahore High Court.
- A suitRestoration of a suit: Article 163, thirty days.
- An applicationA miscellaneous application dismissed in default: Article 181, three years.
Do it right.
Three steps, in this order.
- In timeWithin thirty days, or with a s.5 application.
- SpecificA real cause for the absence, with notice served.
- ComplyRestored on costs? Pay them (PLD 2021 SC 761).
Suit dismissed?
Ask FAI in your own words. It answers with the exact rule and the judgments behind it.
- My suit was dismissed for non-prosecution 40 days ago. Can it still be restored?
- Draft an application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC with a section 5 application.
Example questions
Sources
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order IX Rule 9(1)
Decree against plaintiff by default bars fresh suit Pakistan Code
Educational legal information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts. Speak to a qualified lawyer about your situation. Review status: Pending advocate review. How we check.

















